Two-component
cartridge systems offer users of two-part adhesives and sealants more packaging
and application system choices.

Figure 1. Manual Mixing is Slow and Imprecise
High-volume users who always used material in one designated
location might have been served reasonably well with expensive meter-mix
equipment, which is still a viable option for large-scale dispensing
applications, such as automated assembly lines. However, for most users of
two-component adhesives at remote job sites, or in small volumes not suitable
for meter-mix systems, the only available options are pails, cans, tubs and
tubes that require manual pouring, squeezing, weighing, and mixing (Figure 1).
While many use these manual systems today, most people have found two-component
cartridges to be significantly more convenient and economical after considering
the following factors:
- Labor involved in manually pouring, squeezing, weighing, mixing and
cleanup
- Reliability from one mix to another (accurate and consistent control
of each amount and avoidance of under- or over-mixing)
- Waste and disposal of unused material
- Health risks from direct contact with material
- Exact placement of material
This article provides an overview of the four major cartridge system design
styles available today, including a description, advantages and disadvantages,
and insights on selecting a system for a specific application and/or market.
Coaxial Systems
The
most mature cartridge design contains one component surrounded by the other
(e.g., two cylinders, one within the other). These are typically available in
volumes ranging from 75 mL to 380 mL, and in ratios of 1:1, 2:1, 4:1 and 10:1.
They require a dispensing gun made specifically for this style of cartridge,
although some of the smaller 75 and 150 mL versions can be dispensed using a
screw adapter or a caulking gun and another adapter. Contents are mixed on demand
using a static mix nozzle; if material is left over, the user can simply throw
away the static mixer and reseal the cartridge for future use.

Figure 2. Examples of Side-by-Side Cartridges
Side-by-Side
Currently the most widely used design, these systems consist
of two side-by-side cylinders (Figure 2) that are either snapped together or
molded into one piece. This cartridge offers a much greater range of volumes
and ratios, and is available in unit dose or small syringe configurations
ranging from 1 mL to 30 mL. These dual syringes are usually dispensed with a
hand-held plunger. The larger sizes range from 50 mL to 1500 mL. Many ratios
are available, with 1:1, 2:1, 4:1 and 10:1 being the most popular.

Figure 3. Coaxial, Side-by-Side (shown) and Barrier/Injection-Style Systems Require Specialized Dispensing Guns
Like
the coaxials, larger side-by-side cartridges require a special dispensing gun
(Figure 3) that can only be used with a specific cartridge size and ratio,
although some dispenser models allow for quick changeability from one ratio to
another within the same volume-size cartridge. The contents, as with the
coaxial, are mixed on-demand using a static mix nozzle and can be re-sealed for
future use.
Barrier- or Injection-Style Kits
These are fairly specialized cartridges, and the oldest
technology of the group. They are ideal for non-standard ratios that are not
readily available in other cartridge systems, such as 7:1, 1:3:1, etc. Due to
the design of these kits, the ratio options are almost limitless, and volumes
range from 30 mL to 600 mL.
The barrier style is typically used with ratios between 1:1 and 10:1, and the
injection style with ratios greater than 10:1. Similar to coaxial and
side-by-side cartridges, these kits require a special dispensing gun with a
cartridge retainer to fit the particular size and ratio cartridge. However,
those same dispensers can also be used with many single-component materials
that are available in many of these same-sized cartridges.
Unlike the coaxial or side-by-side cartridges, these systems are not mixed as
they are dispensed - no static mixer is used. The user must manually break the
barrier or inject the second component, then pump back and forth several times
for 30-60 seconds to properly mix the materials (this can be done manually,
semi-automatically or automatically). The inherent disadvantages of this system
are that it’s very easy to under- or over-mix the components. In addition, all
of the contents of the cartridge must be used within the gel time of the
material or the material is wasted.

Figure 4. Cutaway of the u-TAHTM Universal Cartridge
Universal Cartridge System
This
is a fairly new technology that has been revolutionized by the u-TAH
TM
Universal Cartridge (Figure 4) from TAH Industries. It involves dispensing a
two-component material in a cartridge that fits into standard,
professional-grade 1/10th gal (310 mL) caulking guns.

Figure 5. Universal Cartridge Systems Can be Used with Standard Industrial Caulking Guns
The
key to these systems is that they do not require a specialized dispenser that
can only be used with a specific cartridge size and ratio; the same tool can be
used to dispense one- and two-component adhesives and sealants. The universal
cartridge is currently available in 1:1, 2:1 and 10:1 ratios, which all fit
into a standard caulking gun (Figure 5). Like the coaxial and side-by-side
cartridges, the contents are mixed on-demand using a static mix nozzle, and can
be re-sealed for future use.
Choosing the Right Cartridge Option
With all of these options, it can sometimes be difficult for
an adhesive manufacturer to decide which is best for his or her application,
market and customers. Consider the following factors when choosing a cartridge
system:
- Volume required in the cartridge
- Ratio of the materials
- Whether it is a brand new, mature or recently introduced market for
cartridge systems
- Application(s) (knowing how and where the product is being
applied)
~ Will small amounts be applied into tight corners or large amounts on open
areas?
~ Will the application use the entire cartridge at once with only one static
mixer, or will multiple uses require several static mixers?
~ Is accurate placement of a thin bead required, or will the user be simply
filling a hole or spreading a generous amount out in a wide area that might be
masked off?
~ End user (e.g., plant maintenance, construction contractor or DIYer)
~ Knowing your user will point you in the direction of whether they will have
certain dispensers, or not want to use a dispenser at all
The following scenarios illustrate the thinking that should go into the decision-making
process.
Small Packages for the Retail
Market
For the retail market, manual dual-syringe options from 1-30 mL should be
considered, as the DIY customer base will not want to buy a special dispenser.
Another factor to consider is whether a static mixer will be used, as there are
several products in home stores today that are available in the 30-mL size
without a static mixer. Most of the other smaller sizes from 1-14 mL are used
with a static mixer.
Non-Standard Ratio Material
Here, there may not be a viable option in the coaxial, side-by-side or
universal configurations, leaving the barrier/injection style package as the
only choice. As mentioned, the ratios are almost limitless.
Large Volume Required
If the application requires a lot of material to be dispensed, side-by-side
cartridges are available in volumes up to 1500 mL, with a number of options and
ratios between 600 mL and 1500 mL. Other cartridge systems are currently limited
to less than 600 mL.
Markets that Already Use Cartridge
Systems
In many cases, this decision has already been made, because competitors are
supplying products in a particular cartridge system - whether it’s a 50-mL
side-by-side in dental, a 200/300-mL side-by-side in automotive aftermarket, a
380-mL coaxial in marine, a 600-mL side-by-side in construction anchoring, or a
1500-mL side-by-side in sprayed-on truck bed liners.
Since customers are used to using these particular sizes and already have
specific dispensers for them, suppliers will likely keep the same “cartridge
footprint.” However, this does not mean that you can’t be unique and introduce
another size/style cartridge system like the universal style, which provides
the freedom to break away from “special” dispenser requirements entirely.
Entering a New Market for Cartridge
Systems
In this scenario, customers may be using two-component adhesives supplied from
bulk dispensers (e.g., meter-mix equipment) or smaller bulk containers (pails,
tins, tubs or tubes).
Historically, penetrating new markets with cartridge systems that require users
to have dedicated dispensers has been a slow process, as end users were
reluctant to start buying special dispensers that could only be used with a
specific cartridge. This barrier has largely been eliminated with the invention
of the universal cartridge system, which allows end users to use the same
standard caulking guns they are already using for single-component jobs.
However, since the universal cartridge system requires a static mixer that
creates additional backpressure, a professional caulking gun with a mechanical
advantage of 12:1 or greater will often be required. The good news is that home
centers sell these 12:1 guns inexpensively, and 18:1 and 26:1 guns are
available from industrial dispenser manufacturers as well. If a contractor or
plant worker is doing a lot of dispensing with single-component caulking tubes,
they probably already have higher-quality caulking guns.
Dispenser Options
Another factor in the cartridge system decision-making
process is which dispenser options the end user has or wants. Traditionally,
cartridge systems have been dispensed from either a manual or pneumatic gun,
but battery-powered electric guns have entered the market in recent years.
These are expensive, but because they can be used with both two-component
universal-style cartridges and single-component caulking tubes, their cost can
be quickly justified.
Conclusion
It’s
important to research and evaluate all options before making a final decision
on a cartridge system. There are only a few cartridge manufacturers worldwide,
and because some manufacture more than one of these options, they can be a good
source of information to help make an educated decision.
For more information, e-mail info@tah.com.