ASI Magazine
  Home
  ASI Green
  Subscribe
  eNewsletter Subscription
  Subscription Customer Service
  Updates
  Calendar of Events
  Call for Papers
  Features
  Columns
  Today's Headlines
  Price Adjustments
  New Products
  Ad Index
  Podcasts
  Ask Dr. Dave
  ASI Blog
  Online Exclusives
  Adhesives in the News
  Resources
  Books
  Archives
  Digital Edition Archives
  Classified Ads
  Career Center
  Tech ManufactureXPO
  Industry Links
  Online Solutions Web Seminars
  This to That
  Services Marketplace
  E-Newsletter Archives
  Green Opportunities E-News Archives
  Market Research
  Literature Showcases
  Glossaries
  Directories
  ASI Info
  Media Kit
  Contact Us
  Sales Staff
  Reprints
  List Rental
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Ask Dr. Dave
by Dr. Dave Dunn
May 1, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Question: What is the difference between flow-in bonding and weld-through bonding?

Answer: The “weld-through” process is generally accepted as the most economical and effective bonding procedure these days. Weld bonding is commonly used in the automotive industry, at both the OEM level and in body repair. The technique provides the combined benefits of welded joints and adhesively bonded joints. Adhesives used in this application are usually filled with metallic powders to make them electrically conductive.

The term “flow-in” describes bonding processes in which a joint is welded before an adhesive is allowed to flow into the joint. The “weld-through” process involves applying the adhesive first and then welding through the uncured or fully cured adhesive — a common practice in repair procedures. (It is worth mentioning that “flow-in” is sometimes erroneously used to describe processes in which an adhesive is applied and then welded in the liquid state before it has cured.)

Question: I am a re-manufacturer of diesel fuel-injection parts. I am currently experiencing a leakage problem in one of my products, an aluminum casting that contains an aluminum sleeve. I have used epoxy, anaerobic adhesives, flange sealants, press fits and .002” clearance, and yet I still have problems. Can you suggest a remedy?

Answer: It seems to me that you may have an inherent porosity problem with your aluminum castings. Have you considered getting them impregnated with either an anaerobic or heat-cured acrylic sealant prior to applying your adhesive/sealant? These impregnation sealants will fill any porosity in the castings to prevent gas or fluid leaks.


Dr. Dave Dunn
DrDave242@windstream.net
Q&A Exchange is written by Dr. Dave Dunn of F.L.D.Enterprises, a technical consultancy and full-service industrial market-research firm specializing in the adhesives, sealants, specialty rubbers and plastics fields. Dr. Dave is a former vice president and director of Loctite Corp. and has spent many years in troubleshooting adhesive and sealant problems. Questions for publication should be directed to him at 242 Trails End, Aurora OH 44202; phone 330-562-2930; fax (330) 247-1690; e-mail DrDave242@windstream.net .

Links

|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.







© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. The publisher is not responsible for product claims and representations. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author and do not represent those of ASI magazine, its staff, Editorial Advisory Board or BNP Media. | Privacy Policy