Adhesives Mag logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Adhesives Mag logo
  • NEW PRODUCTS
  • NEWS
    • Adhesives & Sealants Headlines
    • Mergers/Acquisitions
    • Events Calendar
    • Market Trends
  • TOPICS
    • Finished Adhesives and Sealants
    • Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives (PSAs)
    • Coatings
    • Raw Materials and Chemicals
    • Materials Handling/Processing
    • Meter/Mix/Dispense
    • Curing
    • Testing/Quality Control
    • Packaging of Adhesives & Sealants
    • Converting/Packaging
    • Composites
    • Sustainability
  • COLUMNS
    • European Perspectives
    • Strategic Solutions
    • Supply Chain Strategies
    • Tape Talk
  • TOP 20
  • MULTIMEDIA
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars
    • eBooks
  • EXPLORE
    • Adhesives in Action
    • Blog
    • ASI Store
    • Industry Links
    • Market Research
    • Classifieds
  • DIRECTORIES
    • Buyers' Guide
    • Global Adhesives & Sealants Directory
    • Raw Materials, Chemicals, Polymers and Additives Handbook
    • Equipment Handbook
    • Distributor Directory
  • EMAGAZINE
    • EMAGAZINE
    • ARCHIVE ISSUES
    • ADVERTISE
      • Custom Content & Marketing Services
    • CONTACT
  • SIGN UP!
Adhesives and Sealants TopicsColumnsSustainabilityRaw Materials and Chemicals

Regulatory Review

Transparency through an Agency Website? Maybe Not.

The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment’s (OEEHA) new website could create more confusion for the public at the expense of those doing business in California.

By Mark Collatz
Regulatory Review: Transparency through an Agency Website? Maybe Not.
May 2, 2016

California regulators are at it again. In the name of providing transparency for consumers, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEEHA) may be on the brink of creating more confusion for the public―at the expense of those doing business in the state. The mischief maker in this case is OEEHA’s recently finalized regulation under Prop 65 that will authorize the development and maintenance of a website to provide information regarding exposures to listed Prop 65 chemicals in consumer products sold in California. The website will reportedly explain which Prop 65-listed chemicals are included in certain types of products and methods of common exposure.

So how will the OEEHA get that information? Any way it can. In its Final Statement of Reasons (FSOR) published with the final rule, the agency concludes that most of the information published on the website will be obtained from “authoritative agencies.” But then it goes on to say that “manufacturers and other interested parties may submit information directly to OEEHA to be considered for publication.” It also notes that the website will include an agency disclaimer regarding the accuracy of information provided by third parties. That’s not much comfort for a company whose product ends up wrongfully mischaracterized on a state of California-maintained website that will most likely be considered gospel by consumers.

The idea that any third party can submit content for a website about a manufacturer’s product without the manufacturer having the opportunity to review or correct that information makes me a bit uneasy—and it should for you, too. During the proposal comment period, the ASC and others raised concerns about the possibility of product misinformation showing up on an official government website. The OEEHA’s response was that scientific and legal experts will be reviewing all material before it is allowed to be made public.

While that sounds like the right answer, think back just two short years when California’s Department of Toxic Substances Control published on its website a Priority Product Profile (PPP) for Spray Polyurethane Foam (SPF) systems as part of its new Safer Consumer Product Rule. That document named a number of polyurethane applications that had nothing to do with spray foam products. In addition, it lumped multiple chemistries and unrelated application systems together and—possibly worst of all—the report referenced chemicals that are not and never have been components of SPF systems. It took the ASC and spray foam manufacturers almost six months to get the agency to acknowledge its mistake and replace the PPP with an accurate document. Still, it wouldn’t be a complete shock to me if the original erroneous document isn’t out there on somebody’s website waiting to be misused. It’s a fact of life in the Information Age that nothing ever disappears from the Internet.

Another unintended consequence of this new website could be the return of the bounty hunter mentality that will use Prop 65 to legally extort money through frivolous lawsuits, a phenomenon that plagued the consumer product retail community in the early years of this law. The OEEHA has acknowledged that the website will discuss products in “generalities” of product categories and will not single out specific brands. Manufacturers of a certain type of product may formulate it to meet a unique function and, for that reason, may include a chemical that triggers the need for the Prop 65 label. Others basically making the same product for a more general purpose tend not to add the extra ingredient, and thus don’t include a warning label. A not-so-discriminating bounty hunter finds two generally similar products on retailers’ shelves, one with a Prop 65 label and one without. We have the makings of a lawsuit. Will the manufacturer without the label be able to defend itself? Of course, but it will cost money, take time and most likely entail some unfortunate publicity along the way.

Consumers deserve to be protected from unsafe products. Thirty years ago, the California public decided that a warning label should be attached to any product containing a listed Prop 65 chemical unless exposure is low enough to pose no significant risk of cancer or is significantly below levels observed to cause birth defects or other reproductive harm. For chemicals that are listed as causing cancer, the “no significant risk level” is defined as the level of exposure that would result in not more than one excess case of cancer in 100,000 individuals exposed to the chemical over a 70-year lifetime. In other words, a person exposed to the chemical at the “no significant risk level” for 70 years would not have more than a “one in 100,000” chance of developing cancer as a result of that exposure.

I think reasonable people would agree that is an extremely small threshold. The information that will eventually end up on this website is unlikely to provide any real contextual value for how these listed products impact the health of California consumers. On the other hand, it may prove a bonanza to an unscrupulous few looking to make a fast buck.

While the new website officially went live in early April, OEEHA staff has made it clear that it will take some time for them to begin to actually populate it with information, at least from the retail community. The ASC will continue to monitor how adhesive and sealant products are characterized on the site in order to ensure that the most accurate and representative information is shared with the public. We ask that our members and others in the industry help us in that effort. 


Any views or opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and do not represent those of ASI, its staff, Editorial Advisory Board or BNP Media.

KEYWORDS: innovation regulation/legislation

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Mark Collatz is Director of Regulatory Affairs for The Adhesive and Sealant Council (ASC). He can be reached at mark.collatz@ascouncil.org.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • mouse in hole

    Using Foam Sealants for Pest Prevention

    According to the National Pest Management Association,...
    Finished Adhesives and Sealants
    By: Kevin Corcoran
  • linked network nodes

    Using the Power of AI for Adhesive and Sealant Formulation

    With the help of software solutions, adhesive formulators...
    Finished Adhesives and Sealants
    By: Karen Parker
  • top20-hero.jpg

    2024 ASI Top 20: Leading Global Manufacturers of Adhesives and Sealants

    ASI's annual ranking of the top 20 global adhesive and...
    Adhesives and Sealants Topics
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Issues
  • eNewsletter
  • Online Registration
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Popular Stories

Picture of three men and one woman cutting a ribbon

H.B. Fuller Opens Adhesives and Sealants Facility in UAE

Picture of Noelle Sieradzki

Mactac Announces Changes to Leadership Team

Aerial view of Bostik manufacturing facility

Bostik Invests in Added Capacity at Massachusetts Manufacturing Plant

ASI Top 20 website

Events

January 1, 2030

Webinar Sponsorship Information

For webinar sponsorship information, visit www.bnpevents.com/webinars or email webinars@bnpmedia.com.

View All Submit An Event

Products

Structural Adhesives: Properties, Characterization and Applications

Structural Adhesives: Properties, Characterization and Applications

See More Products

ASI CASE EBOOK

Related Articles

  • Mark Collatz regulatory review

    Regulatory Review: Examining the recent U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) policy decision concerning chlorinated paraffins

    See More
  • headlines and news

    EPA Proposes Rule to Improve Guidance Transparency

    See More
  • Regulatory Review

    At Long Last, TSCA Reform Passes

    See More
×

Keep the info flowing with our eNewsletters!

Get the latest industry updates tailored your way.

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey & Sample
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Youtube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing